Visa Restrictions - the story so far

Posted by: Manick Govinda on Mar 21, 2011
Two years ago I launched a campaign, with the civil liberties group The Manifesto Club, against the UK Home Office’s draconian new immigration restrictions with a letter in The Observer signed by a stellar cast of artists, theatre and gallery directors, an exclusive news feature and a petition for 10 Downing Street. This was not a protest against the thorny issue of immigration, but the concern I had that the new regulations would severely curb the mobility of artists from non-EU countries to participate in art activities in the UK. Since its introduction in November 2008, the new restrictions have had a detrimental impact on artists’ residencies, live performances, the ability for artists and writers to attend their exhibition previews and book launches, attending talks, conferences and on collaborative work with UK artists and performers.

The restrictions do not discriminate against art-forms; everyone from great classical pianists, ballet dancers, theatre companies, performance artists to grassroots capoeira, tango, samba and choral groups are affected. The Labour government introduced a points-based system [PBS] of border control and entry to the UK; a hugely bureaucratic, costly piece of state machinery that also requires host arts organisations to act as immigration agents by being legally obliged to keep electronic copies of passports or other forms of biometric ID on file, monitoring and spying on the guest artists’ everyday whereabouts. A relationship that was once based on trust, camaraderie, artistic passion and cultural reciprocity between a guest artist and a UK host was now bureaucratized and based on a foundation of suspicion and fear. The fear of being fined £10,000 upwards, having your sponsorship license taken away (a compulsory requirement in order to invite non-EU artists) means that venues such as The Place and Sadlers Wells now require all performers, crew, photographers – in fact everyone except the audience – to show legal paperwork such as passports, visa stamps, certificates of sponsorship (a serial number given to invited non-EU artists under the PBS sponsorship system), to prove that they are allowed to “work” or perform. There may well be other arts venues who also ask for this. For people who believe passionately in freedom in everyday life and our ability to freely engage and associate with whomever we choose to without interference, this is a serious affront to our civil liberties. Whether we are a British/EU-national or not, we are all required to perform this act of submission to the state, and arts centres and education institutes have quietly become outposts of the UK Borders Agency.

Within the last two years, the Manifesto Club’s campaign has been a thorn in the side of the Home Office and the UKBA. Our petition has nearly 10,700 signatories, we have gathered influential Peers, artists, writers and other campaign groups such as English PEN to oppose and influence the debate around the visa and PBS restrictions. The campaign has influenced the Mayor of London Boris Johnson to speak critically about the excessive regulations and its impact on London’s international cultural status. We have also gathered a huge dossier of stories of invited non-EU artists being refused visas, deported and banned from the UK, published as reports which have been influential in shaping debate. The Greater London Authority recently undertook a London-wide survey to find out how PBS was affecting the capital’s second-to-none arts scene. And this month the Earl of Clancarty initiated a serious 90 minute debate in the House of Lords where a significant number of Peers damned the PBS and the guillotine-like immigration cap introduced by the coalition government.

The battle is not over, even though there have been some concessions made by UKBA in an attempt to placate our protests – an ill-thought out Entertainers visitor route (what are we, Butlins holiday entertainers? Wedding singers?), PBS exemptions for major arts festivals, allowing non-EU orchestral musicians, classical and contemporary dancers to be employed by UK arts companies – these are both ludicrous and piecemeal gestures. The campaign will not rest until there is a radical overhaul of the system, when non-EU artists are seen as cultural professionals - who should rightfully be paid - and friends who are welcome to the UK without the bureaucratic intrusion and interference of these Kafkaesque regulations. The PBS was introduced to counter-act the threat of international terrorism and the so-called “influx” of economic migrants and illegal immigration to the UK. Our argument is that invited temporary visits of non-EU artists to the UK is not an added burden to the economy, nor are cellists and other artists taking work away from Britons, smuggling drugs or bringing bombs into the UK. International cultural exchange is a good thing in itself for artists, institutes and ultimately the British public, it should be a vital issue to fight for in the name of unfettered artistic freedom.

If PBS is affecting your ability to invite non-EU artists to participate in cultural activities in London, please come to Artsadmin and Manifesto Club’s round-table debate on 5 April, 6:30pm.

Manick Govinda is Head of Artists’ Advisory Services, and is on the Steering Committee of The Manifesto Club.
Tagged with:
Left by Manick Govinda on May 6, 2011 06:13PM

Mayor of London's Cultural Advisor on Radio 3's In Tune, last night 22 March 2011 on visa restrictions - a transcript:

Sean Rafferty – With the cultural Olympiad on the horizon it seems we have less rather than more diversity, the Greater London Authority held an investigation showing events had to be cancelled because of the points based immigration system.

Miunira Mirza is advisor to the Mayor of London on culture. Munira, how bad is it?

MM - In the survey we did over 70% of arts organisations complained of increased admin and costs 1/3 said working with fewer non-European artists. The reason we commissioned the survey was we wanted some evidence to go to government and say they need to review the system. It is putting off artists from coming to the UK and and working in UK

SR – we have a comment from the UKBA which said they want to bring creative talents to the UK but not at expense of the border system.

MM – I'm sure it is not beyond the wit of man to find a system which manages borders but doesn't restrict create talent coming in. The restrictions are over the top. There will be dancers or performers who do not have English as a proficiency so they are seemingly not qualified, The guidance is misgiuded, it doesn't recognise that artists work in a particular way, the riles aren't built for them.

SR - And presumably those increased requirements stop people coming in for one gig and going out again

MM – Yes, as I've said already, we know of concerts being cancelled artists being refused visas, it discourages the art sector from looking wider than Europe, looking further away, we are more than a european city, we are an international city

SR– And with the Olympics coming up, the cultural Olympiad, it is a bit ironic

MM – Yes, we want to send message out that we welcome people, we are a diverse culture, yet at the borders we are sending out the message that if you're talented but don't tick right boxes then you're not welcome

Left by Manick Govinda on Mar 25, 2011 02:58PM

I've just had this piece published on the Migrants Rights Network blog:

Left by Manick Govinda on Mar 25, 2011 05:17PM

The acclaimed South African playwright Mike van Graan reported visa refusals of 2 African Artists to Artsadmin - read mine and his statements here:

Left by on Feb 23, 2018 01:20PM

Left by on Mar 18, 2019 01:54PM

Left by on Sep 26, 2019 09:26AM

Leave a comment
Human identification process

This website uses cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Find out more about our cookie policy.